The latest trial resulted in a victory for Merck (MRK) in the important category of alleged victims who took Vioxx for less than eighteen months. In this case, Richard Irvin had taken Vioxx for less than one month when he died of a heart attack.
A critical part of MRK's victory was a pretrial ruling by the judge that prevented an "expert" pathologist from attributing Mr. Irvin's deadly clot to Vioxx. This was a major departure from last fall's headline case in Texas where a doctor practically put Vioxx on the deceased's tombstone.
This legal process may go on for awhile. Another trial is currently under way in Rio Grande City, Texas (surprise) in what will certainly be a more plaintiff-friendly process. As headlines develop, investment opportunities may as well, allowing for increased investments on worse than expected verdicts.
Monday, February 20, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
MSFT - Revising my Misconceptions
I have been listening to an outstanding podcast that can be found at www.acquired.fm. A recent episode focused on the history of MSFT which ...
-
The major pharmaceutical companies, collectively known as Big Pharma, are often criticized for not enough new drugs and too much marketing. ...
-
Soon to be former CEO of Home Depot (HD) Robert Nardelli has been heavily criticized for his excessive compensation. My voice has certainly ...
-
My first post was on IBM's decision to freeze its pension plan. Subsequently I posted on the GAO's study of pension plan underfundin...
No comments:
Post a Comment