Today's WSJ summarizes the history of executive compensation through stock options. The story is partially disturbing because it highlights what my Humanities teacher taught: "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." But it's even more disturbing because it points to our own lack of responsibility.
These CEOs were absolutely corrupt, in the sense of lacking a fiduciary responsibility to their public shareholders. In a wide range of companies from UnitedHealth Group to Citigroup to Disney, the behaviors of the CEOs have been unwarranted. As fiduciaries, these CEOs should be held to a "prudent man" level of compensation.
Yet, my high school lessons indicate that the real responsibilities lie more fully with the board of directors and major shareholders. The board is responsible for the oversight of the CEO and the shareholders for the board. All too often, though, shareholders, and thus boards, are more focused on simply getting the price of the stock to go up. When shareholders, such as myself, invest more time and energy on good governance then we are less likely to see such egregious behaviors. Analogous to voting, it's our "public duty."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
MSFT - Revising my Misconceptions
I have been listening to an outstanding podcast that can be found at www.acquired.fm. A recent episode focused on the history of MSFT which ...
-
The major pharmaceutical companies, collectively known as Big Pharma, are often criticized for not enough new drugs and too much marketing. ...
-
Soon to be former CEO of Home Depot (HD) Robert Nardelli has been heavily criticized for his excessive compensation. My voice has certainly ...
-
My first post was on IBM's decision to freeze its pension plan. Subsequently I posted on the GAO's study of pension plan underfundin...
No comments:
Post a Comment